> On Mar 27, 2:03 pm, Henry <9...(at)insidejob.gov> wrote:
>
>
>
> After 7 years of posting non-stop on this one subject and not
> persuading even one person here about your conspiracy theory, isn`t
> the answer obvious now, Henry?
>
> We`re all in on it!
>
> This newsgroup is an elaborate ruse, created by the American
> government and monitored by CIA agents in preparation for the 9/11
> plot, as a way of siphoning away what`s left of your sanity. We drink
> your milk shake. We drink it all! Bwa ha haa haaaaaa!
A far flung conspiracy of rich and poor, right and left, old
and young, black and white, etc. In short, pretty much
everybody who`s anybody is in on it.
I shouldn`t have to remind you though not to talk
about it in front of you know who. Please try to be
more careful in the future.
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: Eric Gisse
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 11
On Mar 27, 12:03=A0pm, Henry wrote:
[snip stupidity, unread]
Apparently Henry is tired of confining his spew to a multi-thousand
post thread which hasn`t convinced him of one fucking thing since it
was created in the middle of last year.
Why don`t you light yourself on fire at where the trade center used to
be? Even more people will pay attention to you! You might even get a
blurb on the national news!
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: Rob Kleinschmidt
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 47
On Mar 29, 5:07=A0am, Henry wrote:
> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
> > Flaming bunch of paranoid buffoons too lazy to check
> > their facts.
>
> =A0 Speaking of being too lazy to check your "facts", do
> you still stand by your claim that, "Absolutely nobody
> in the structural engineering community seems to find
> the collapse difficult to believe"?
Let`s look at your experts.
James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire
Science Division of the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), whom you cited as agreeing
with you says the report is flawed because it
underestimated the fuel load but attributes the
collapse to fire.
Bachmann and Schneider have exactly one quote
attributed to the by Daniele Ganser. Schneider
is never even quoted directly. If you know of any
articles written personally by either one, cite them.
Joseph M. Phelps appears to engineer golf courses.
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Phelps_Joseph_4276043.aspx
secureutah.gov lists a Doyle Winterton as a retired
engeineer/Land Surveyor with an expired Engineer in
Training certificate. If that`s the wrong guy, let`s
see the right one.
Charles Pegelow and WIlliam RIce appear to have
last worked on building design in the 1970s.
Pegelow engineers oil rigs. Rice is retired.
We could go on to your second string experts, but I
don`t find your first string very credible.
There are I think, about 125,000 members of the ASCE
who are OK with the report or, as in the case of Quintierre
question technical details of the fire analysis but don`t buy
into conspiracies. But you knew that already.
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: Rob Kleinschmidt
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 23
On Mar 29, 11:40=A0am, totallydeadmail...(at)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote:
> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
> > Let`s look at your experts.
>
> No, let`s leave the toilet cleaner to his far more important work.
>
> Shit, if people didn`t reply to his ravings, he wouldn`t clog up Usenet
> like a blocked Armitage Shanks.
When somebody makes a really moronoic assertion
about experts agreeing with them it`s worth maybe
one post to explain to them that they`ve just said
something really stupid.
A smart person at this point will take stock of what
they`re saying and stop saying stuff that`s demonstrably
stupid. A not so smart person will persist and attempt
to make their assertion true by further argument.
I think I know what to expect from Henry but figured
it was worth one statement of the facts anyway.
I apologize for encouraging this bullshit.
Title: Afghanistan
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:58:49 +0000
Author: Benjamin Wendell
8 US Soldiers Killed in Afghanistan Attack
SNAFU, FUBAR, a total complete out of control disaster, whatever you want to call it. Obama and his general are at odds. No surprise. Yesterday on CNN, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State were interviewed. The take home lesson: We’re in Afghanistan for the long haul. Ummm…not to put too fine a point on it, but we’ve already been IN Afghanistan for the long haul. Longer that either world war, Korea, or Vietnam. We’ve been there longer than the Soviets or the Brits or anyone else who’s tried and failed to subdue the Mujahadeen. No one seems willing to admit that the Taliban is like a cockroach. You can kill all of them a hundred different ways, leave nothing but a smoking crater, and sooner or later the roach comes crawling out of the rubble, reproduces, and covers your kitchen counters in the dark of night. Has anyone in Washington heard that old saw about discretion being the better part of valor? The generals want another “surge”, and I have no doubt that a surge would succeed…as long as we keep surging…which we can’t do forever. It’s long past time to walk away from this mess, not that that’s going to happen.
BW
More on: http://leftrightandcentered.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/afghanistan-2/
Car modding | Automotive | Engine | Ferrari
Powered by Lv501.com