secureutah.gov lists a Doyle Winterton as a retired
engeineer/Land Surveyor with an expired Engineer in
Training certificate. If that`s the wrong guy, let`s
see the right one.
Charles Pegelow and WIlliam RIce appear to have
last worked on building design in the 1970s.
Pegelow engineers oil rigs. Rice is retired.
We could go on to your second string experts, but I
don`t find your first string very credible.
There are I think, about 125,000 members of the ASCE
who are OK with the report or, as in the case of Quintierre
question technical details of the fire analysis but don`t buy
into conspiracies. But you knew that already.
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11 GO >>>
From: Rob Kleinschmidt
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 23
On Mar 29, 11:40=A0am, totallydeadmail...(at)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote:
> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
> > Let`s look at your experts.
>
> No, let`s leave the toilet cleaner to his far more important work.
>
> Shit, if people didn`t reply to his ravings, he wouldn`t clog up Usenet
> like a blocked Armitage Shanks.
When somebody makes a really moronoic assertion
about experts agreeing with them it`s worth maybe
one post to explain to them that they`ve just said
something really stupid.
A smart person at this point will take stock of what
they`re saying and stop saying stuff that`s demonstrably
stupid. A not so smart person will persist and attempt
to make their assertion true by further argument.
I think I know what to expect from Henry but figured
it was worth one statement of the facts anyway.
I apologize for encouraging this bullshit.
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11 GO >>>
From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 16
On Mar 27, 2:03=A0pm, Henry wrote:
> http://911blogger.com/node/14549
>
> =A0 Report Of WTC Collapse Cover-Up Justifies Call For New Inquiry
> Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth experts demand questions answered
I know the answer...but you wont like it. The government didn`t do it
and yes my friends you can take a building down by flying an airplane
full of fuel into it.
Better yet explain how those EXPERTS can continually get all
the info, use the best formulas, best computer models (their words)
and continually come to the WRONG conclusion.
HOW can the be so dang stupid?
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11 GO >>>
From: parris_k(at)yahoo.com
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
On 28 Mar, 06:10, Wolfie wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > "Henry" wrote in message
> >news:fsguj7$hqp$1(at)ruby.cit.cornell.edu...
> >>http://911blogger.com/node/14549
>
> >> Report Of WTC Collapse Cover-Up Justifies Call For New Inquiry
> >> Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth experts demand questions answered
>
> > Scarcely new and it scarcely matters. No one takes "truthers" seriously
> > anymore. They have been repeated debunked.
>
> Especially by those claiming billions from the insurers.
Got an example, wolfy?
>
> --
> Wolfie
Title: Judge Carter: NO Discovery YET Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:33:09 +0000 Author: politicaldoc
