> > Let`s look at your experts.
>
> No, let`s leave the toilet cleaner to his far more important work.
>
> Shit, if people didn`t reply to his ravings, he wouldn`t clog up Usenet
> like a blocked Armitage Shanks.
When somebody makes a really moronoic assertion
about experts agreeing with them it`s worth maybe
one post to explain to them that they`ve just said
something really stupid.
A smart person at this point will take stock of what
they`re saying and stop saying stuff that`s demonstrably
stupid. A not so smart person will persist and attempt
to make their assertion true by further argument.
I think I know what to expect from Henry but figured
it was worth one statement of the facts anyway.
I apologize for encouraging this bullshit.
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 16
On Mar 27, 2:03=A0pm, Henry wrote:
> http://911blogger.com/node/14549
>
> =A0 Report Of WTC Collapse Cover-Up Justifies Call For New Inquiry
> Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth experts demand questions answered
I know the answer...but you wont like it. The government didn`t do it
and yes my friends you can take a building down by flying an airplane
full of fuel into it.
Better yet explain how those EXPERTS can continually get all
the info, use the best formulas, best computer models (their words)
and continually come to the WRONG conclusion.
HOW can the be so dang stupid?
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: parris_k(at)yahoo.com
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
On 28 Mar, 06:10, Wolfie wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > "Henry" wrote in message
> >news:fsguj7$hqp$1(at)ruby.cit.cornell.edu...
> >>http://911blogger.com/node/14549
>
> >> Report Of WTC Collapse Cover-Up Justifies Call For New Inquiry
> >> Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth experts demand questions answered
>
> > Scarcely new and it scarcely matters. No one takes "truthers" seriously
> > anymore. They have been repeated debunked.
>
> Especially by those claiming billions from the insurers.
Got an example, wolfy?
>
> --
> Wolfie
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: Rob Kleinschmidt
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 39
On Mar 30, 5:36=A0am, Henry wrote:
> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
> > When somebody makes a really moronoic assertion
> > about experts agreeing with them it`s worth maybe
> > one post to explain to them that they`ve just said
> > something really stupid.
>
> =A0 Speaking of exactly that, do you still stand by
> your claim that "Absolutely nobody in the structural
> engineering community seems to find the collapse difficult
> to believe"?
1 golf course engineer (Phelps), 2 guys who worked on
buildings in the 1970s (Rice and Pegelow), 2 more
(Bachmann and Schneider) who have never publicly
acknowledgedthe quotes attributed to them, one
retired surveyor (Doyle) with an expired engineer in
training license and one idiot, (you) who never bothered
to check the credentials of his "experts".
Which of these guys do you find most credible ?
Which of them is in the structural engineering
community for that matter ?
These appear to be Phelp`s credentials
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Phelps_Joseph_4276043.aspx
Joe, who has Bachelor of Science and Master of
Science degrees from the California Institute of Technology,
has held a number of positions in the fields of golf
and engineering. Those positions include Vice President
- Engineering of Turnkey Golf Projects, Inc., Director
of Golf Technology Consultants, and Commissioner of
the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District.
How `bout them credentials ?
Title: Honor student beaten to death: Can Chicago curb youth violence? | csmonitor.com
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:41:42 +0000
Author: MB Snow
Nadashia Thomas, a cousin of 16-year-old Derrion Albert, looks at posters of him at Fenger High School in Chicago on Monday. A vigil for Derrion was planned at his school.
Honor student beaten to death: Can Chicago curb youth violence?
Derrion Albert was apparently caught in a brawl between two rival student groups as he walked home from Fenger High School. It’s not the city’s first such incident: In 2008, more than 30 students were killed.
By Amanda Paulson | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
September 28, 2009 edition
CHICAGO – The melee that ensnared Chicago junior Derrion Albert last week wasn’t an unusual occurrence in a neighborhood where tensions and gang violence often erupt, say residents.
But the fight left Derrion dead – apparently caught in the brawl between two rival student groups as he walked home from Fenger High School. This has brought renewed focus on a neighborhood and a city where youth violence is a longstanding problem.
More on: http://sroblog.com/2009/10/03/honor-student-beaten-to-death-can-chicago-curb-youth-violence-csmonitor-com/
Powered by Lv501.com