Political Talks Archive

1st page | 2nd page | 3rd page | 4th page | 5th page | 6th page | 7th page | 8th page | 9th page | 10th page | 11th page | 12th page | 13th page | 14th page | 15th page | 16th page | 17th page | 18th page | 19th page | 20th page | 21th page | 22th page | 23th page | 24th page | 25th page





Subject:
Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11

investigation !!

Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT)

Organization: http://groups.google.com

Lines: 39

















On Mar 30, 5:36=A0am, Henry <9...(at)insidejob.gov> wrote:

> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

> > When somebody makes a really moronoic assertion

> > about experts agreeing with them it`s worth maybe

> > one post to explain to them that they`ve just said

> > something really stupid.

>

> =A0 Speaking of exactly that, do you still stand by

> your claim that "Absolutely nobody in the structural

> engineering community seems to find the collapse difficult

> to believe"?



1 golf course engineer (Phelps), 2 guys who worked on

buildings in the 1970s (Rice and Pegelow), 2 more

(Bachmann and Schneider) who have never publicly

acknowledgedthe quotes attributed to them, one

retired surveyor (Doyle) with an expired engineer in

training license and one idiot, (you) who never bothered

to check the credentials of his "experts".



Which of these guys do you find most credible ?

Which of them is in the structural engineering

community for that matter ?



These appear to be Phelp`s credentials



http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Phelps_Joseph_4276043.aspx



Joe, who has Bachelor of Science and Master of

Science degrees from the California Institute of Technology,

has held a number of positions in the fields of golf

and engineering. Those positions include Vice President

- Engineering of Turnkey Golf Projects, Inc., Director

of Golf Technology Consultants, and Commissioner of

the Riverside County Flood Control and Water

Conservation District.



How `bout them credentials ?











Next Topic

SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>

From: Rob Kleinschmidt
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 14








On Mar 29, 11:56=A0pm, totallydeadmail...(at)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote:
> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

> > A smart person at this point will take stock of what
> > they`re saying and stop saying stuff that`s demonstrably
> > stupid. A not so smart person will persist and attempt
> > to make their assertion true by further argument.

> Fair enough. I suppose everyone mustr have one stab at trying to invent
> perpetual motion ;-)

I think we`ve already discovered it. Now we could
only figure out a useful application for Henry.


Next Topic

SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>

From: adykes(at)panix.com (Al Dykes)
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: 30 Mar 2008 13:32:37 -0400
Organization: PANIX -- Public Access Networks Corp.
Lines: 62








In article ,
Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
>On Mar 30, 5:36=A0am, Henry wrote:
>> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
>> > When somebody makes a really moronoic assertion
>> > about experts agreeing with them it`s worth maybe
>> > one post to explain to them that they`ve just said
>> > something really stupid.
>>
>> =A0 Speaking of exactly that, do you still stand by
>> your claim that "Absolutely nobody in the structural
>> engineering community seems to find the collapse difficult
>> to believe"?
>
>1 golf course engineer (Phelps), 2 guys who worked on
>buildings in the 1970s (Rice and Pegelow), 2 more
>(Bachmann and Schneider) who have never publicly
>acknowledgedthe quotes attributed to them, one
>retired surveyor (Doyle) with an expired engineer in
>training license and one idiot, (you) who never bothered
>to check the credentials of his "experts".
>
>Which of these guys do you find most credible ?
>Which of them is in the structural engineering
>community for that matter ?
>
>These appear to be Phelp`s credentials
>
>http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Phelps_Joseph_4276043.aspx
>
>Joe, who has Bachelor of Science and Master of
>Science degrees from the California Institute of Technology,
>has held a number of positions in the fields of golf
>and engineering. Those positions include Vice President
>- Engineering of Turnkey Golf Projects, Inc., Director
>of Golf Technology Consultants, and Commissioner of
>the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
>Conservation District.
>
>How `bout them credentials ?



Gage`s (founder of ae911) own credentials don`t give him the
qualifications to make his claims on his own.

Here`s Gage`s resume.

Resume: http://members.shaw.ca/loudstudios/GageCV.pdf

It appears he`s never been in charge of any project. He has no
structural engineering background and on his list of software he is
familair with, none of CAD/CAM/FEA tools that NIST and the engineers
use are listed.



--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail




Next Topic

SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>

From: Rob Kleinschmidt
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 31








On Mar 30, 5:54=A0am, Henry wrote:
> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 5:07 am, Henry wrote:
> >> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
>
> >>> Flaming bunch of paranoid buffoons too lazy to check
> >>> their facts.

> =A0 Do you still stand by your claim that, "Absolutely nobody
> in the structural engineering community seems to find
> the collapse difficult to believe"? There are over 300
> members ofhttp://www.ae911truth.orgalone.

Piece of cake. Lets look at Judy Woods.

Judy Woods believes the twin towers were
destroyed by a secret energy beam.

Judy Woods is an engineer.

Judy Woods is not a structural engineer.

Therefore:

Some engineers are paranoid buffoons with no
knowledge of what they`re talking about.

What part of this logic do you disagree with ?




Title: Bravo billie
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:55:59 +0000
Author: Dave Bath

A post about a single comment on LP, unfortunately by someone who didn’t leave a hotlink to their own blog:

I think Malcolm would make a better Labor Prime Minister than Rudd.

Billie at LP 2009-11-02

Whether Billie was talking of Turnbull or Fraser, it’s hard to disagree, and I wished I’d point it so succinctly when doing a "compare and contrast" on climate change rhetoric and policies before and after the election, giving the honors to Turnbull.

See also this.


More on: http://balneus.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/bravo-billie/







Car modding | Automotive | Engine | Ferrari





Powered by Lv501.com