Political Talks Archive
Subject:
Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 55
On Mar 30, 5:41=A0pm, Henry <9...(at)insidejob.gov> wrote:
> =A0 So, I have two questions for you.
> 1. How can you accept as credible or believable, a reference
> who so grossly represents both evidence and basic physics?
> Eagar`s disinformation was broadcast on millions
> of TVs all over the globe, yet, attempts to expose his errors
> and reveal the truth and facts get little notice by the same
> corporate media. That too, should tell you something.
And that`s exactly the point that you don`t get. I don`t
have to. The analysis has been reviewed and will continue
to be reviewed by engineering departments all over the world
including Cornell, MIT, Cambridge and BYU.
Some of the things you learn to trust in engineering are
peer review and collaberative efforts pooling expertise
in different fields.
People like Quintierre will find problems with parts of the
analysis and sugest alternatives.
Start with the credentials of the nist team
http://wtc.nist.gov/pi/
and compare them with this guy Gage, whose
career seems to be building sandwich shops
and gymnasiums.
> 2. What =A0falling blocks and sticks have to do with the tilting
> of a tall narrow structure that`s resting on the ground?
I would not attempt to explain the exact causes of the
collapse, though perhaps somebody in the Cornell
school of engineering might walk you through it if
you asked nicely.
What I have concluded is that the thermite demolition
theory is stupid enough that I can conclude with certainty
that it is not in any way possible.
That pretty much leaves a plane crash and fire, as
virtually every qualified expert in the world suggests.
If you can find a published technical analysis by Bachmann,
or Schneider I`d be genuinely curious and will read it.
If you can`t find such an analysis, then perhaps
you guys should stop claiming them as being
your active supporters.
Anyway, Gage, Phelps, and Winterton look pretty
bogus. the other two, Rice and Pegelo don`t look
very current, and of you other engineers, I`ll bet
a significant number of the drive a choo choo.
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 33
On Mar 30, 4:21=A0pm, john wrote:
> On Mar 30, 4:10 pm, "P. Roehling" wrote:
>
> > "john" wrote
>
> > > U.S.A. is providing the entertainment.
> > > I especially like George`s statement that
> > > when he saw the first plane hit- he doesn`t
> > > remember exactly where, but thinks it must have been
> > > somewhere in the school while he was waiting to
> > > see the kids (what a fatherly figure)- when he *saw*
> > > the
> > > first plane hit, he thought it was `pilot error`.
>
> > > U.S.A. seems to have a little of that.
> > > Pilot error, I mean.
>
> > Was Earth your first planet, John?
>
> As in, if I don`t shut up
> it will be my last?
>
> John
paranoid are we? Forgot our tinfoil hat and medications did you...
The truthers are all idiots on the subject of "What happened to the
towers"
They speak about some grand conspiracy the same way virgins talk about
sex...lots of enthusiasm and now acutal knowledge.
--
Keith S
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 12
On Mar 30, 8:10=A0pm, Henry wrote:
Henry bring those loons ALL 300 with you. I`ll use small words that a
8th grader will understand. Then maybe you will all realize what fools
you`ve been. I hate to see you fooled by these people.
The US government didn`t do it, though an argument could be made that
our "friends" the Saudi Arabians did.
--
Keith S
SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>
From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 36
On Mar 30, 7:56=A0pm, Henry wrote:
> S`mee wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 2:03 pm, Henry wrote:
> >>http://911blogger.com/node/14549
> >> =A0 Report Of WTC Collapse Cover-Up Justifies Call For New Inquiry
> >> Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth experts demand questions answered=
> > I know the answer...but you wont like it. The government didn`t do it
> > and yes my friends you can take a building down by flying an airplane
> > full of fuel into it.
>
> > Better yet explain how those EXPERTS can continually get all
> > the info, use the best formulas, best computer models (their words)
> > and continually come to the WRONG conclusion.
>
> > HOW can the be so dang stupid?
>
> =A0 WTF? The experts are coming to the right conclusion. There
> is no longer any reasonable doubt that 9-11 was an inside
> job. Here`s a partial list. Got even *one* expert who can
> explain WTC7`s free fall speed and symmtric drop yet? Seems
> like seven years would be enough time to find just *one*....
>
I read those, I even understand them adn frankly they come to some
spurious ignorant fantasies imo and in my experience.
How many CREDABLE demolition experts say it can be done the wya you
claim? Not a one that`s how many and those are the people to ask.
Engineers build, demo destroies.
Your so called experts are full of shit.
--
Kieth S
Title: Real Journalism... Before Blogs! Down and Dirty With Ian Lind
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:21:20 +0000
Author: Damon
A few days ago Ian Lind ran across some old files that I think are very worthy of attention. The las
More on: http://damontucker.com/2009/11/06/real-journalism-before-blogs-down-and-dirty-with-ian-lind/
Car modding |
Automotive |
Engine |
Ferrari
Powered by Lv501.com