Political Talks Archive

1st page | 2nd page | 3rd page | 4th page | 5th page | 6th page | 7th page | 8th page | 9th page | 10th page | 11th page | 12th page | 13th page | 14th page | 15th page | 16th page | 17th page | 18th page | 19th page | 20th page | 21th page | 22th page | 23th page | 24th page | 25th page

Subject:
Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11

investigation !!

Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:43:06 -0700 (PDT)

Organization: http://groups.google.com

Lines: 55

On Mar 30, 5:41=A0pm, Henry <9...(at)insidejob.gov> wrote:

> =A0 So, I have two questions for you.

> 1. How can you accept as credible or believable, a reference

> who so grossly represents both evidence and basic physics?

> Eagar`s disinformation was broadcast on millions

> of TVs all over the globe, yet, attempts to expose his errors

> and reveal the truth and facts get little notice by the same

> corporate media. That too, should tell you something.

And that`s exactly the point that you don`t get. I don`t

have to. The analysis has been reviewed and will continue

to be reviewed by engineering departments all over the world

including Cornell, MIT, Cambridge and BYU.

Some of the things you learn to trust in engineering are

peer review and collaberative efforts pooling expertise

in different fields.

People like Quintierre will find problems with parts of the

analysis and sugest alternatives.

Start with the credentials of the nist team

http://wtc.nist.gov/pi/

and compare them with this guy Gage, whose

career seems to be building sandwich shops

and gymnasiums.

> 2. What =A0falling blocks and sticks have to do with the tilting

> of a tall narrow structure that`s resting on the ground?

I would not attempt to explain the exact causes of the

collapse, though perhaps somebody in the Cornell

school of engineering might walk you through it if

you asked nicely.

What I have concluded is that the thermite demolition

theory is stupid enough that I can conclude with certainty

that it is not in any way possible.

That pretty much leaves a plane crash and fire, as

virtually every qualified expert in the world suggests.

If you can find a published technical analysis by Bachmann,

or Schneider I`d be genuinely curious and will read it.

If you can`t find such an analysis, then perhaps

you guys should stop claiming them as being

your active supporters.

Anyway, Gage, Phelps, and Winterton look pretty

bogus. the other two, Rice and Pegelo don`t look

very current, and of you other engineers, I`ll bet

a significant number of the drive a choo choo.

SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>

From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 33

On Mar 30, 4:21=A0pm, john wrote:
> On Mar 30, 4:10 pm, "P. Roehling" wrote:
>
> > "john" wrote
>
> > > U.S.A. is providing the entertainment.
> > > I especially like George`s statement that
> > > when he saw the first plane hit- he doesn`t
> > > remember exactly where, but thinks it must have been
> > > somewhere in the school while he was waiting to
> > > see the kids (what a fatherly figure)- when he *saw*
> > > the
> > > first plane hit, he thought it was `pilot error`.
>
> > > U.S.A. seems to have a little of that.
> > > Pilot error, I mean.
>
> > Was Earth your first planet, John?
>
> As in, if I don`t shut up
> it will be my last?
>
> John

paranoid are we? Forgot our tinfoil hat and medications did you...

The truthers are all idiots on the subject of "What happened to the
towers"

They speak about some grand conspiracy the same way virgins talk about
sex...lots of enthusiasm and now acutal knowledge.
--
Keith S

SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>

From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 12

On Mar 30, 8:10=A0pm, Henry wrote:

Henry bring those loons ALL 300 with you. I`ll use small words that a
8th grader will understand. Then maybe you will all realize what fools
you`ve been. I hate to see you fooled by these people.

The US government didn`t do it, though an argument could be made that
our "friends" the Saudi Arabians did.

--
Keith S

SUBJECT: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
GO >>>

From: "S`mee"
Subject: Re: !! Architects and Engineers expose cover-up and request new 9-11
investigation !!
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 36

On Mar 30, 7:56=A0pm, Henry wrote:
> S`mee wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 2:03 pm, Henry wrote:
> >>http://911blogger.com/node/14549
> >> =A0 Report Of WTC Collapse Cover-Up Justifies Call For New Inquiry
> >> Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth experts demand questions answered=

> > I know the answer...but you wont like it. The government didn`t do it
> > and yes my friends you can take a building down by flying an airplane
> > full of fuel into it.
>
> > Better yet explain how those EXPERTS can continually get all
> > the info, use the best formulas, best computer models (their words)
> > and continually come to the WRONG conclusion.
>
> > HOW can the be so dang stupid?
>
> =A0 WTF? The experts are coming to the right conclusion. There
> is no longer any reasonable doubt that 9-11 was an inside
> job. Here`s a partial list. Got even *one* expert who can
> explain WTC7`s free fall speed and symmtric drop yet? Seems
> like seven years would be enough time to find just *one*....
>

I read those, I even understand them adn frankly they come to some
spurious ignorant fantasies imo and in my experience.

How many CREDABLE demolition experts say it can be done the wya you
claim? Not a one that`s how many and those are the people to ask.
Engineers build, demo destroies.

Your so called experts are full of shit.
--
Kieth S

Title: American Muslims Exposed!
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:42:01 +0000
Author: jaraad

Four Congressional Republicans accused The Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) of "trying to infiltrate the offices of members of Congress by placing interns in the offices." [video]

I think the fundamental American justice system rule “It is not what you know, it is what you can prove.” does not apply to Muslims. I am not just referring to this story but rather to many other unfortunate stories or incidents from “randomly” selecting every Muslim look-a-like to be screened in American airports to accusing innocent Muslims of plotting a terrorist act. Why CAIR wants to spy on America? What is their motive? American Muslims are the most educated and professionals among other minorities here in the US. Yet, unfortunately they will always be looked at as having a hidden agenda to destroy America. For sure not all Americans believe of this unrealistic conspiracy theory but as long as Fox news is the number 1 TV news in America this attitude towards Muslims in general and American Muslims in particular will continue and may, unfortunately, spawn more hatred towards Muslims if it lasted longer.

More on: http://jaraad.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/american-muslims-exposed/

Powered by Lv501.com