On Feb 28, 8:02 pm, Kurt Lochner
wrote:
> "senilecave...(at)yahoo.com" whimpered and groveled before:
>
>
>
> > milt.sh...(at)gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > Besides the fact that not all nuclear plants run using steam,
>
> >
> > run using steam..
>
> Do I have to `school` you again, senile caveman? *>LOL!<*
>
> http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/01.pdf
>
> High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR)
>
> "Another type of reactor uses helium gas instead of water as
> its media for removing heat from the core. The only high
> temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) in the United States
> was the Fort St. Vrain plant in Colorado. The plant was
> manufactured by General Atomic Company of La Jolla, California.
> High temperature gas-cooled reactors are widely used in other
> countries."
steam to run the turbine generator.. So far, there are no commercial
nuclear units that turn the generator with anything but steam...
SUBJECT: Re: As usual, I`ve run away from Zepp, Lochner & Shook, yipping like
GO >>>
From: "stevencanyon(at)yahoo.com"
Subject: Re: As usual, I`ve run away from Zepp, Lochner & Shook, yipping like
a little frightie rightie caught lying again and again today..
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 65
On Feb 28, 8:38 pm, Kurt Lochner
wrote:
> "senilecave...(at)yahoo.com" whimpered and groveled again:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Kurt Lochner was laughing at the expense of:
>
> > >"senilecave...(at)yahoo.com" whimpered and groveled before:
>
> > > > milt.sh...(at)gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > Besides the fact that not all nuclear plants run using steam,
>
> > > > I`m waiting for an example of a nuclear plant that doesn`t
> > > > run using steam..
>
> > > Do I have to `school` you again, senile caveman? *>LOL!
> > >http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/01.pdf
>
> > > High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR)
>
> > > "Another type of reactor uses helium gas instead of water as
> > > its media for removing heat from the core. The only high
> > > temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) in the United States
> > > was the Fort St. Vrain plant in Colorado. The plant was
> > > manufactured by General Atomic Company of La Jolla, California.
> > > High temperature gas-cooled reactors are widely used in other
> > > countries."
>
> > > --Welp, you`ve been busted again, senile caveman..
>
> > sorry, Licky, but Fort St. Vrain plant nuclear plant [..]
>
> Did you have trouble reading and understanding the above text?
Irony anyone?
It said that the reactor was cooled by gas, not that the turbine
was cooled by gas, you dummy
> >So far, there are no commercial nuclear units that turn the
> >generator with anything but steam...
>
> Prove it, since you made that claim..
Easy enough... .
http://fsv.homestead.com/FSVHistory.html
"Decommissioning of the reactor, as well as shipping of all nuclear
fuel off-site to a U.S. Department of Energy managed facility, was
complete in 1992. Fort St. Vrain was the first commercial nuclear
generating plant in the United States to be decommissioned. In 1996,
generation from FSV began again, this time with a combustion turbine
burning natural gas and generating 130 megawatts of power. A heat
recovery steam generator (HRSG) was added, and steam was provided to
the old main steam turbine."
I repeat "main steam turbine."
Easy enough to show that Licky Lochner is a moron, too.
SUBJECT: Re: As usual, I`ve run away from Zepp, Lochner & Shook, yipping like
GO >>>
From: Matt
Subject: Re: As usual, I`ve run away from Zepp, Lochner & Shook, yipping like
a little frightie rightie caught lying again and again today..
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 43
{13DDDFB7-E75C-4D5E-B1B2-CBFF41AABE19}; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 1.0.3705;
.NET CLR 3.0.04506.590; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR
2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
On Feb 28, 6:18=A0pm, "stevencan...(at)yahoo.com"
wrote:
> On Feb 28, 8:02 pm, Kurt Lochner
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "senilecave...(at)yahoo.com" whimpered and groveled before:
>
> > > milt.sh...(at)gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > Besides the fact that not all nuclear plants run using steam,
>
> > > =A0 =A0I`m waiting for an example of a nuclear plant that doesn`t=
> > > run using steam..
>
> > Do I have to `school` you again, senile caveman? =A0*>LOL!
> >http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/01.pdf
>
> > High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR)
>
> > "Another type of reactor uses helium gas instead of water as
> > =A0its media for removing heat from the core. The only high
> > =A0temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) in the United States
> > =A0was the Fort St. Vrain plant in Colorado. The plant was
> > =A0manufactured by General Atomic Company of La Jolla, California.
> > =A0High temperature gas-cooled reactors are widely used in other
> > =A0countries."
>
> =A0 sorry, Licky, but Fort St. Vrain plant nuclear plant used
> steam to run the turbine generator.. =A0So far, there are no commercial
> nuclear units that turn the generator with anything but steam
No, it didn`t.
It is also out of commission, having cost billions and provided
nothing.
Matt
SUBJECT: Re: As usual, I`ve run away from Zepp, Lochner & Shook, yipping like
GO >>>
From: "stevencanyon(at)yahoo.com"
Subject: Re: As usual, I`ve run away from Zepp, Lochner & Shook, yipping like
a little frightie rightie caught lying again and again today..
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 57
On Feb 28, 8:57 pm, Matt wrote:
> On Feb 28, 6:18 pm, "stevencan...(at)yahoo.com"
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 28, 8:02 pm, Kurt Lochner
> > wrote:
>
> > > "senilecave...(at)yahoo.com" whimpered and groveled before:
>
> > > > milt.sh...(at)gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > Besides the fact that not all nuclear plants run using steam,
>
> > > > I`m waiting for an example of a nuclear plant that doesn`t
> > > > run using steam..
>
> > > Do I have to `school` you again, senile caveman? *>LOL!
> > >http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/01.pdf
>
> > > High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR)
>
> > > "Another type of reactor uses helium gas instead of water as
> > > its media for removing heat from the core. The only high
> > > temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) in the United States
> > > was the Fort St. Vrain plant in Colorado. The plant was
> > > manufactured by General Atomic Company of La Jolla, California.
> > > High temperature gas-cooled reactors are widely used in other
> > > countries."
>
> > sorry, Licky, but Fort St. Vrain plant nuclear plant used
> > steam to run the turbine generator.. So far, there are no commercial
> > nuclear units that turn the generator with anything but steam
>
> No, it didn`t.
Sorry, dummy, but yes it did...
http://fsv.homestead.com/FSVHistory.html
"Decommissioning of the reactor, as well as shipping of all nuclear
fuel off-site to a U.S. Department of Energy managed facility, was
complete in 1992. Fort St. Vrain was the first commercial nuclear
generating plant in the United States to be decommissioned. In 1996,
generation from FSV began again, this time with a combustion turbine
burning natural gas and generating 130 megawatts of power. A heat
recovery steam generator (HRSG) was added, and steam was provided to
the old main steam turbine."
I repeat "main steam turbine."
> It is also out of commission, having cost billions and provided
> nothing.
>
> Matt
Title: What does this Libertarian believe in?
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:32:12 +0000
Author: dorock99
There is a part of the libertarian movement that advocates complete anarchy, that is not what most of us advocate.
Yes, social programs that coerce individuals to do good with other peoples money would go away. However, it is my strong belief, that through the creation of fair/just laws, most individuals in society will not have any reason to divide themselves along party, racial, gender, occupation, class, and other social lines. The unfair/unjust laws we create give power to discrimination, which in my opinion make it profitable for individuals to divide themselves. For instance who says a doctor is a more valuable member of society then a plumber? Well, for one you had to be told by someone and for them to make this outcome possible they had to legislate and advantage being a doctor over a plumber. (I’ll explain further at the bottom)
Freedom
Personally i think given the option of holding more of your money and having more say of where it goes would give individuals even more incentive to help their follow man. If their fellow man is truly in need.
The goal of a libertarian society would be to make sure all legislation pertaining to citizens is equal across the board. The extension of freedom would not destroy the ability to do good. You’ve been indoctrinated to think, the only way individuals will do good for others is through force and coercion, but there is no evidence to make this empirically true.
Our country is coerced into giving to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Unemployment to the tune of trillions of dollars. However, our society also willingly gives more than 300-400 billion dollars a year to charities. Could you imagine how much money could be given to charities each year without the threat of government coercion?
Do you know how many people would rather do good with their own money than use other citizens money to do good with?
More on: http://dorock99.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/social-programs-labor-and-wage-market-and-libertarians/
Car modding | Automotive | Engine | Ferrari
Powered by Lv501.com